Daniil Glinka vs Luc Wieland Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

In terms of performance on second serves over the past six months, Glinka has demonstrated a higher success rate, winning 43.31% of points, compared to Wieland's 39.29%. This statistic is strongly correlated with accurate match predictions, indicating an advantage for Glinka in serving capabilities.

On return games, recent statistics reveal that Glinka has been successful in winning 45.85% of their opponents' second serve points, while Wieland surpasses this by securing 48.08%. For first serve returns, Glinka achieved 23.8%, whereas Wieland excelled with 32.5%, suggesting a slight edge for Wieland in return performance.

Under pressure situations, such as breakpoints, Glinka outshines Wieland by saving 56.19% of them recently, in contrast to Wieland's 27.27%. This is a crucial statistic for predicting in-game outcomes and favors Glinka in crucial moments.

Examining past performance, Glinka has clocked a win rate of 60.61% over the last year (W/L 40/26), marginally surpassing Wieland's 57.14% (W/L 4/3). This offers a clearer overall match prediction outlook, with Glinka having a slight historical advantage.

In terms of surface performance, Glinka performs best on indoor hard courts with a 57% win rate (W/L 62/47), and a lesser 47% on clay (W/L 26/29). Conversely, Wieland's best career win percentage is also on clay at 40% (W/L 2/3), making them less versatile across different surfaces compared to Glinka.

Considering the quality of opponents faced, Glinka's average opponent ranking over the last year stands at 423.59, whereas Wieland has faced competitors averaging a rank of 63.71. This indicates that Wieland is used to facing tougher competition.

If the match extends to a deciding set, Wieland boasts a slightly better success rate, winning 50% of such sets, compared to Glinka's 47%. This could prove beneficial in live match predictions.

In breakpoint conversion statistics, Wieland holds a superior recent form, converting 41.67% of opportunities, overshadowing Glinka's 30.77%. This could be pivotal for live betting dynamics.

Ultimately, while both players have their strengths, the overall statistical analysis suggests a slight edge for Glinka due to better overall match win percentage, second serve performance, and higher breakpoint save percentage under pressure. However, Wieland's experience against higher-ranked opponents and superior breakpoint conversion offers potential for a challenging match. Glinka, based on these stats, may hold the advantage to claim victory in this upcoming encounter.